| 3M is leveraging its plastics expertise with its US-made LED bulb. Currently sold only through Walmart, the lamp's embossed plastic bulb serves as a light pipe for the $25 dimmable LED 60W replacement bulb. Figure 1.
The first thing you'll notice when handling the bulb is that it's heavy: 228.9 gms, or half a pound. For reference, an incandescent bulb weighs about 34 gm; A 60W CFL is 59.8 gm; The Philips L-Prize bulb is 170.5 gms. So, OK, it's heavy: How does it perform?
The bulb emits 800 lm at 4000K, which is a colder white than most current LEDs. (3M's website lists it as also available in a warmer white, but no such bulb is listed on the Walmart site). The bulb consumes 13.5W, standard for a 60W LED replacement bulb.
Although 3M lists the bulb as dimmable, the company hedges by warning that the bulb is not compatible with all dimmers. My experience with dimming was that the bulb consistently flickered at a mid-way point. However, with power full-on, there was no flicker. There was virtually no noise – I had to put my ear right up next to the bulb, and even then heard anything only when the bulb was dimmed to its flicker “sweet spot.” Noise isn't a concern with this bulb. (Here's more information on the bulb's dimming as well as a video of its dimming performance).
What's inside that bulb? The plastic bulb cover has eight vertical slits evenly spaced over its top half. Figure 2 is a close-up photo with the bulb powered full-on. Because it fills the digital camera sensor, the sensor compensates and shows the relative light source over the surface of the bulb. The light comes out unevenly, with the brightest part being the lower half, and at the very top.
Under the bulb cover is a giant metal heat radiator. It sits right next to the slits in the top of the bulb, which let the heat from the radiator out into the ambient air. It's now apparent that the plastic is not opaque white, but instead is a clear textured plastic. Figure 3 is a still from the 3M website video.
The Cree LEDs surround the base of the bulb, and their light is directed up and out through the plastic, which is actually a light guide. This explains why Figure 2 showed a greater amount of the light exiting at the bottom.
On to the bulb's power control. Figure 4 is a close-up of the power control IC: It's a TI chip, but this time instead of the LM3445 I found in the recent Best Buy Insignia bulb teardown, it's the chip's little brother, the LM3444. The 3444 can do dimming, but requires additional circuitry.
Since the bulb is dimmable, I wondered why 3M didn't use the 3445 rather than the 3444 and save on some external parts? Here is 3M Engineering's answer:
“...Our earliest efforts did involve the LM3445 to enable TRIAC dimmability. The circuit design was such that a sufficient current was consumed to exceed the holding current of most TRIACs. This means a few milliamps that results in a power waste and then it was still not guaranteed that any TRIAC dimmer would result in satisfactory performance. As a result, the circuit conversion efficiency was inferior.
There are many circuit requirements that can be ranked in terms of desirability, TRIAC dimmability and efficiency are just two of those. Both LM3444 and LM3445 can be configured to enable TRIAC dimmability so the LM3445 should not necessarily be considered the dimmable version of the LM3444. However, with the LM3444 we established a superior conversion efficiency.There are other advantages of our present LM3444 design so that that converter became preferred for our present product.
[We] would like to point out that there are many commercial dimmers available that do not use TRIACs and that perform well with our present LM3444 circuit. If consumers desire dimmability, there is that option.”
3M opted to go their own route for dimming and one of the prime considerations was to save on holding current. My experience, as mentioned above, was that there was significant flicker with a TRIAC dimmer. On the other hand, the bulb was virtually noise-free.
The light pipe-based design played to 3M's strengths in the plastics field. This may be an indication of what 3M hoped to accomplish with this bulb, which, as a Walmart product, will see very wide distribution: By getting this design out in front of a large audience, 3M has immediately gained credibility for its light pipe design and light architecture, making it much easier to sell to more specialized and higher profit margin applications. From 3M's point of view this compensates for the relative heaviness of the product and any dimming limitations.
For more information on TRIAC dimming and additional pictures, visit this extended review of the 3M bulb.
|
| Name: james fackert Posted: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:01 |
| I don't know who designed this thing for 3M, but it is a mess. It looks like someone was trying to do every aspect differently than anyone else, with no regard for economy or efficiency, A half a pound of lamp, mostly heat sink? come on! It is a huge waste of materials and resources, and underperforms lamps such as the Cree bulb replacement available at Best Buy, which weighs about 1/4 as much.
The 1/8" thick plastic light pipe diffuser is cute but has no benefit. I expected clever use of 3M's optical films to create a low cost, light weight lamp with super even light output over the whole sphere, but noooooo...
| | Name: bsala Posted: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:01 |
| I would hope that the electronics and LEDs in these bulbs do last the distance, because I assume that the bulk of the mass is an aluminium heatsink, and there was a considerable energy input to create that lump of metal.
If the lamp were to fail prematurely, its efficiency gains while operating would not recover the energy used in its manufacture.
Do any of the LED lamp makers consider how to recover the aluminium heatsink after the bulb dies? | | Name: geraldr Posted: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:01 |
| Phase fired dimmers are a weak concept: one of the goals of modern electrical devices is to maximize power factor and minimize conducted harmonics. Add to that the claim on the packaging of many such dimmers that they can 'save' electricity which is at variance with their poor power factor when 'saving' energy while they need to consume 3+ Watts to function properly. By modern standards, these have to be the cheesiest bit of overpriced electronics one can buy (on a par with the 5 transistor radio). Then, these dimmers provide no means of changing the color of my smarter LED lamps forever dooming one to have to keep the remote handy. And, there is no comprehensive way to manage the dimmer from the lamp unless there is always a 1:1 relationship between dimmers and lamps i.e. no pot lights, chandeliers, track lights etc. If you really want to use an old school dimmer, add a 5W 3600 Ohm resistor as a load. | | Name: dennis mccarthy Posted: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:02 |
| Margery
Thanks for your evaluation summary. I am a big believer in doing
disassembly analysis of LED products.It clarifies which components
are actually being used and how they perform.
This summary was insightful
and educational. The whole SSL industry is better off for having
LED buyers doing their due diligence - "under the hood" analysis like yours done on this product really
help the consumer understand what their paying for ! |
|
