LOGIN  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ADVERTISE  |  CONTACT US
LEDs MAGAZINEILLUMINATION IN FOCUSSTRATEGIES IN LIGHTTHE LED SHOWSTRATEGIES UNLIMITED
LEDs Magazine
HOMEARTICLESNEWSPRODUCTSSUPPLIERS DIRECTORYEVENTSMAGAZINENEWSLETTERSJOBSTOPIC CENTERRESOURCE CENTER
 INDUSTRY NEWS
< Previous  |  Next >  |  Contents (May 2010)
Share |
Cleantech reports lighting controls energy savings
24 May 2010
Research reveals that lighting control schemes can reduce commercial building energy consumption 35% – 55 %, and technologies such as LED lighting could add to the savings.

Lighting comprises as much as 38% of the electricity expense in a commercial building according to a new Cleantech Approach (CTA) research report, but lighting control technology can greatly reduce that energy usage. The "Lighting Controls: Savings, Solutions, Payback, and Vendor Profiles" report projects 35% - 55% energy savings that delivers a payback on the investment in new lighting in 2.7 to 10.7 years.

CTA recommends that companies first adopt a lighting control system when trying to cut energy usage. The company points out that control systems carry little of the technology risk associated with new lighting technologies such as LED-based solid-state lighting (SSL). Moreover CTA expects a control system installed today to be compatible with new SSL technology in the future.

The projected energy savings in the report are due purely to the ability to dim or extinguish lights automatically when they aren't needed. The adoption of a technology such as SSL could further reduce consumption.

The CTA report calculates the investment payback periods based on a range of costs for a lighting upgrade combined their estimates for the energy savings potential. In the worst case scenario, a project would cost $2.50 per square foot and only save 35% in energy expenses resulting in a 10.7-year payback. In a best case scenario, a project would cost $1.00 per square foot and save 55% in energy expenses resulting in a 2.7-year payback.

The potential flaw in the recommendation that companies install lighting controls separately from SSL is that many of the most advanced control schemes are SSL centric (see related stories at right). Moreover, many legacy lights can't be dimmed or turned off-and-on instantaneously.

COMMENTS
Name: robert   Posted: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:06
55% savings with only lighting, a bit hight dont you think. I have done several commercial buildings and to make that kind of savings stick you have to include all of the buildings (elecrical)users like HVAC components (chillers, pumps, boiler(s), VAV or FCU units on the floors and lifts). On average in a commercial building with only lighting as a component you will have a Max 10% saving on the total of the building, you could have 60% saving only with lighting!!!!
Name: sslpro   Posted: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 05:08
It seems to me as a SSL advocate - Sales Rep that the industry trend is to incorporate lighting controls. This is great the consumer benefits the most- Banish those that can't keep up SSL concerns selling 09 product ( Dc led driven Leds)should offer quality or go the way of yugo-I believe the use of controls and intelligent SSL is the wave of now in our industry. Good parallel is the phone industry some of the products out there are like i phones while others are like brick phones- Which ones the relic vs the gold standard.
LINKS
Channels
Drivers & Control
Indoor Illumination
Related Links
CTA Lighting Controls Report
Related Stories
Digital Lumens promises 90% energy savings via networked LED lighting
Redwood Systems brings network-powered approach to LED office lighting
Copyright © 2007-2013 PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK. All Rights Reserved. LEDs Magazine is part of PennWell's Technology Group, which also includes:
Designed by Kestrel Web Services