LOGIN  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ADVERTISE  |  CONTACT US
LEDs MAGAZINEILLUMINATION IN FOCUSSTRATEGIES IN LIGHTTHE LED SHOWSTRATEGIES UNLIMITED
LEDs Magazine
HOMEARTICLESNEWSPRODUCTSBUYERS GUIDEEVENTSMAGAZINENEWSLETTERSJOBSTOPIC CENTERRESOURCE CENTER
 INDUSTRY NEWS
< Previous  |  Next >  |  Contents (January 2011)
Share |
Outdoor Lighting: Dover installs LEDs, others question technology costs
13 Jan 2011
The city of Dover, Delaware is installing 118 LED street lights, while Foley, Alabama considers a SSL project and the citizens of Rochester, Minnesota question the economics of a pilot project.

Dover, Delaware hopes to save more than $350,000 over 20 years in energy costs by installing LED street lights. The city of Foley, Alabama along with Riviera Utilities are studying the viability of a conversion to solid-state-lighting (SSL) on its streets, and a pilot program in Rochester, Minnesota has drawn criticism from citizens that question the cost of LEDs relative to the benefits.

According to the Dover Post, the city will install 118 LED street lights at a cost of $3000 per fixture. The city will use a portion of a $180,400 grant from the US Department of Energy (DOE) to fund the project.

The city expects that the LED lights will use one third of the energy used by the current lights. Moreover the city expects superior performance from the LEDs in terms of nighttime visibility. The city judged the benefits to be sufficiently significant to justify using the city’s general fund to cover costs that exceed the grant money.

Citizens question LED costs

The citizens of Rochester, Minnesota, meanwhile, aren’t so sure that LED street lights are a wise investment. The local Post Bulletin newspaper published an editorial entitled LED streetlights are solid long-term investment last week applauding a pilot project undertaken by the Rochester Public Utilities. Subsequently, the paper published largely-negative comments made in response to the article by local citizens.

The Rochester pilot was funded by a federal block grant. But the editorial noted that the LED lights cost $833 each compared to $346 for a traditional street light. The article projected a payback period of 12-15 years.

The bulk of the comments lamented the use of taxpayer money on what was perceived as an unnecessary expense. One person did have positive things to say about their experience with LED lighting in the home, and suggested that the city would actually realize a shorter payback period based on lower maintenance costs.

Foley studies LEDs

According to an article in the Mobile Press-Register, the city of Foley, Alabama has embarked on a study to determine whether a transition to LED street lights is economically viable. The article projected energy savings of 30% attributable to SSL, although many outdoor lighting installations have bested that projection.

Foley is working with the Riviera Utilities power company to complete the study. The city’s economic development director expects that LEDs will be broadly adopted in street lights at some point but questions whether now is the time to make such a move.

The director likens today’s LED technology to computers of the late 1980s or early 1990s. That characterization may be a bit unfair from a pure technology perspective as LEDs for general lighting are vastly improved. But there is no question that prices will drop significantly with more advanced manufacturing lines and specifically larger semiconductor wafers that yield more LED chips.

About the Author 
Maury Wright is the Senior Technical Editor of LEDs Magazine.
COMMENTS
Name: mag-led   Posted: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:01
Working for a lighting fixture manufacture I would like nothing more than to be able to sell LEDs to every one of my customers, but regretfully I have morals that keep me from lying through my teeth in order to make a sale. When I sell fixtures I want that customer comments to be "That's exactly what I wanted" and come back again when they need more fixtures.
To sell customers fixtures allowing them to believe they will get the same illumination as they were from their existing HID (high intensity discharge) lamps and save money in the process from an energy reduction, I would be lying. The fact is most people who are buying these fixtures are falling prey to the smooth-talking salesman who himself in not sure what he is selling.
If you cannot get the same light/energy out of the fixture when you compare light sources, you will not cover the same area. It is simple physics. I repeat, you need to get the same energy OUT of the fixtures to be comparable. I am not interested in what is getting trapped in the lenses or reflectors but what is getting out of either fixture and able to reflector off some surface that I can see. Being that the only reason we can see anything is because light energy is reflecting off it.
So in short I believe that LEDs have their place and can be used in many different applications around the world. But if you are going to spend your money thinking you are going to save lots of money on your electric bill please be sure to make someone prove to you that you are going to get what they say you are going to get.
Name: gerryw   Posted: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:01
The response from Rochester is actually encouraging. In the hierarchy of resistance to change, this is the level which can be approximately described as "It may work somewhere else but not here". This is about half-way up the ladder to general acceptance.
Pilot programs present a poor example as they access no economies of scale and are rendered in the first 10% of the learning curve. In the early days, they may be necessary but very quickly they're just what people do as an act of resistance. I live near a community that pioneered the use of electric street lights and there was no pilot project - but this was a private rather than public enterprise decision. Communities would do better to spend money on bringing their professionals and politicians up to speed on new technology so that they could make informed decisions straight up.
Name: yatahay   Posted: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:01
$3000 per fixture sounds absurd. "The city will use a portion of a $180,400 grant from the US Department of Energy (DOE)(a.k.a. US Tax Payer) to fund the project." What happens to the rest of the GRANT? The Mayor of Dover's bank account? Anytime one of these punk municipalities gets involved, the price always goes up.
Name: harpat   Posted: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:02
India, China and the communist countries are not the only ones with massive government corruption.
Name: john pappas   Posted: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:02
Actually the majority of the Rochester Mn favor the new LED streetlights. The comment section of the Post Bulletin has four or five regular posters who use 20-25 different persona's who object to anything even remotely like progress.
LINKS
Channels
Outdoor Illumination
Related Stories
California and Iowa cities get LED street lights (Jan 2011)
Corunna deploys LED retrofits, Osram announces retrofit kit (Dec 2010)
Author
Maury Wright
Copyright © 2007-2013 PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK. All Rights Reserved. LEDs Magazine is part of PennWell's Technology Group, which also includes:
Designed by Kestrel Web Services