Lighting for Health & Wellbeing

FDA counsels consumers against specific UV disinfection wands

Aug. 10, 2022

To date, seven manufacturers have received FDA warnings that portable GUV products exhibited defects that render them unsafe by “presenting a risk of injury to the user and nearby persons.”

Carrie Meadows

In late July, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety alert advising consumers of safety risks associated with specific brands of portable ultraviolet devices claimed to disinfect objects and surfaces. According to the agency’s alert, “The FDA is aware that some manufacturers are marketing unsafe UV wands to consumers to disinfect surfaces and kill germs in the home or similar spaces outside most health care settings. The FDA recommends that consumers do not use these products and consider using safer alternative methods.”

LED industry insiders have cautioned about such safety risks in the past several years, as UVGI products flooded the consumer market in the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic. As time and research into the effectiveness of UV radiation against SARS-CoV-2 have marched on, public health advisors and scientists have decreased the focus on surface contamination as a vehicle for that particular pathogen. That is not to say that other microbes pose no concern with regard to contact with contaminated surfaces. Indeed, infections in clinical settings can often be spread in this manner, leading market consultants and product developers to recommend multimodal approaches involving proper manual (“terminal”) cleaning, continuous visible-light disinfection to reduce bioburden, and UV application at proper doses and schedules to minimize exposure of occupants.

Products found too potent

Regardless, on the direct-to-consumer side, correct safety information and operational guidance is critical as some manufacturers have placed unsafe designs into the hands of users without appropriate protections or warnings in place.

UV wand manufacturers with products on the FDA’s warning list include:

In My Bathroom LLC, “dba” IMB
Magic UV Light Sanitizer
Max‐lux Corporation
MerchSource LLC
OttLite Technologies Inc.
PhonoSoap LLC
Vanelc

In its advisory, FDA noted, “When a product is advertised to disinfect in seconds, it likely means that it gives off an unsafe level of UV-C radiation. The FDA testing determined that some UV wand products give off at a distance of about two inches, as much as 3,000 times more UV-C radiation than the exposure limit recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.”

FDA has linked a letter of notification to each of the manufacturers in question on its safety communication page. In one such letter to Max-Lux Corporation, the agency wrote:

“STL is an electronic product whose primary purpose objectively is as a handheld product intended to emit UV radiation for sanitizing purposes. […] instructions for use, which were provided by the destination agent but not included with the shipping package or with the multiple boxes containing an STL […] inside the shipping package, instruct the user to “[h]old the UV-C lamp toward the items, leave 1 inch above surface and go back and forth slowly over the entire surface for 30 to 60 seconds to be sterilized.’ Following these directions would cause the user to hold the STL in the hand for the duration of the sterilization process, causing the hand to be in close proximity to the source of the radiation for the entirety of the sterilization process.”

FDA further noted that the STL product’s spectral irradiance at the 200- to 400-nm range was effectively measured at 4.02 W/m² at a distance of 5 cm from the wand, “present[ing] a risk of injury to the user and nearby persons.” The agency advised that the ICNRP recommended exposure limit is “3.0 mJ/cm² effective spectrally weighted in the UV range, within an 8-hour period.”

The “risk of injury” by an unshielded user includes photokeratitis and erythema — damage to the eyes and skin.

Check out the UV wand alert updates on the FDA website, where you can also find additional resources to report on problems with products.

CARRIE MEADOWS is managing editor of LEDs Magazine, with 20 years’ experience in business-to-business publishing across technology markets including solid-state technology manufacturing, fiberoptic communications, machine vision, lasers and photonics, and LEDs and lighting.

For up-to-the-minute LED and SSL updates, follow us on Twitter. You’ll find curated content and commentary, as well as information on industry events, webcasts, and surveys on our LinkedIn page and our Facebook page.

About the Author

Carrie Meadows | Editor-in-Chief, LEDs Magazine

Carrie Meadows has more than 20 years of experience in the publishing and media industry. She worked with the PennWell Technology Group for more than 17 years, having been part of the editorial staff at Solid State Technology, Microlithography World, Lightwave, Portable Design, CleanRooms, Laser Focus World, and Vision Systems Design before the group was acquired by current parent company Endeavor Business Media.

Meadows has received finalist recognition for LEDs Magazine in the FOLIO Eddie Awards, and has volunteered as a judge on several B2B editorial awards committees. She received a BA in English literature from Saint Anselm College, and earned thesis honors in the college's Geisel Library. Without the patience to sit down and write a book of her own, she has gladly undertaken the role of editor for the writings of friends and family.

Meadows enjoys living in the beautiful but sometimes unpredictable four seasons of the New England region, volunteering with an animal shelter, reading (of course), and walking with friends and extended "dog family" in her spare time.